How it Went

Ladies and gents, we had a great time Sunday night. By my count, at least 21 people showed up representing no fewer than 11 states. Of these states, four are existing affiliates, one was informally recognized at the convention (Colorado) and four more are potentially organizing affiliates.

In attendance were George Phillies, Alden Link, and Tom Stevens. All three were nominated during the informal convention for president, thus qualifying them to be considered by the members of the several state affiliates for either president or vice president.

To speed things along, owing to ballot access deadlines, the national committee voted to leave open the nominations process until 10 June 2008 (23:59) and allow additional nominees to be proposed. To be proposed, a prospective nominee must be nominated by a member of a recognized affiliate in one state and seconded by a member of a recognized affiliate in another state.

As well, we are eager to seat additional state affiliates. Currently New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee are accepted affiliates meeting all the requirements. Colorado is in process of being accepted, and we have interest in California, Texas, Massachusetts, Wyoming, Kansas, and North Carolina.

The nominees for president and vice president are to be selected in an online convention to take place on this site on 14 June 2008 at 9 p.m. eastern time, 6 p.m. Pacific. We will also have a national committee nominating convention and undertake other business on 24 October, as previously announced.

For the record, the New York affiliate nominated George Phillies, whose nomination was seconded by both New Jersey and Tennessee. Alden Link was nominated by New York and seconded by Pennsylvania. Tom Stevens was nominated by New Jersey and seconded initially by a gentleman from the New York affiliate, who later insisted that it was the booze talking, so I record for future reference that Stevens was seconded by Maker's Mark.

Two things about the Libertarian Party's convention struck me as worth noting, both at our convention and here online. First, there was a large light display behind the podium, featuring 2008 above a windmill. This symbolized, for me, that the LP is now blowing whichever way the prevailing wind blows. Those who believe they can build a solid structure on a foundation of shifting sand - in the windstorm of expedience - are welcome to try.

Second, there was a speaker who nominated Wayne Root for vice president. He mentioned Root's parents had formed the Conservative Party in New York to address difficulties they had with the Republican Party of New York back when it was Nelson Rockefeller's home in the 1960s. The speaker said that Root's parents knew that the way to reform a major party was not from within, being constantly frustrated by those with the power and positions, but by leaving the party to form a better party. That way, they were more free to criticize what was really wrong with the party they found no longer acceptable. A more obvious and palpable case for the Boston Tea Party could not have been stated.

Finally, I would like to close by suggesting that those who wish to donate to Ballot Access for the Boston Tea Party should send the check or money order payable to Ballots for Boston Tea Party to:

attn: Jim Davidson
Ballots for Boston Tea Party
2040 West 31st Street, Suite G169
Lawrence, KS 66046

We can accept private courier deliveries at that address if you refuse to use the socialized post office.

We believe that we can secure 5 state ballot access with our existing organization and about $5,000. We would like to have 50 state ballot access as soon as possible, but that would cost at least 100 times as much.

Comments

planetaryjim:

Friends, I was contacted by George Phillies today. He writes, in part, "I much appreciated your hospitality. I am of course profoundly honored by your offer, but I must respectfully decline your offer of being considered for your nomination."

So, that's it for George as a candidate in 2008 for the Boston Tea Party's nomination.

It has been suggested that we approach Christine Smith about the nomination. I would ask anyone with contact with her to do so.

southernpatriot:

What are the requirements for starting a State Affiliate?

planetaryjim:

The text of the first paragraph of that article is the relevant part, and reads as follows:

"The National Committee may recognize, and accept affiliation with the Party of, new or previously existing state or local political parties. Such recognition shall be predicated upon the unanimous consent of the National Committee and upon adoption by the prospective affiliate of the Party's platform and acceptance by the prospective affiliate of the obligation to run the Party's presidential and vice-presidential candidates, nominated in convention, as its own candidates for those offices on its ballot line."

http://bostontea.us/bylaws

Wes Pinchot:

If I understand correctly, in Colorado, for 2008, we need 1000 registrants by June 1 to have our own ballot line with party designation. That isn't going to happen.

Does it satisfy the by-laws if we get the candidate(s) on as "Independents"? Apparently we can do that with $500 by June 17.

Do we need to buy the "Independent" ballot line before we're recognized? That may be difficult, because I assume we need the name of the candidate to buy the ballot line.

Wes Pinchot
Interim Colorado chair, Boston Tea Party

planetaryjim:

Wes, please don't worry about ballot access for 2008 for the Boston Tea Party. You can register as many people as you like before the 1st of June, and very likely you won't get the party on the ballot.

Yes, it does satisfy my understanding of your obligation if you get our candidates on the ballot as independents in Colorado this year. I think that would be great.

We have to think about the Boston Tea Party as a long term project. We'll want to have candidates in Colorado on the ballot in 2009 if there are any elections, in 2010 for state and Congress elections, and in 2012. Obviously, we have some time, then, to meet the challenge of a thousand registered voters choosing to identify with our party. Possibly the best place to get those voters is on college campuses during the school year. If we start in late August this year, we can have a few tables on a few campuses and sign up some students.

Meanwhile, do the best you can. I understand the candidates won't be on the ballot with our party name. That's okay. Nothing can be done about it. Having them on the ballot as independents is a good thing. For the $500, I suggest you ask the candidates once they are chosen. Some of them have money to spend on ballot access.